growth-and-innovation

Six Sigma Quality Improvement Strengthened Laboratory Testing Accuracy

Add Redcliffe Labs as preferred on

Improving Laboratory Quality Through Six Sigma Metrics

Redcliffe Labs conducted a two-phase quality improvement study using Six Sigma metrics to strengthen laboratory testing processes, reduce errors and improve the reliability of diagnostic results.

The study evaluated 25 routine, high-volume laboratory parameters across clinical chemistry and immunoassay testing. Following targeted quality improvements, the average Sigma performance increased from 6.4σ to 9.2σ, with 17 of the 25 parameters showing an improvement of at least 1.0 Sigma.

One of the most significant improvements was observed in glucose testing, where the Sigma metric increased from 3.9σ to 26.3σ, corresponding to a reduction in estimated defects from 9,224 Defects Per Million Opportunities (DPMO) to fewer than 1 DPMO.

What Is Six Sigma in Laboratory Diagnostics?

Six Sigma is a quality management methodology used to identify, measure and reduce errors in a process.

In laboratory diagnostics, Six Sigma metrics can be used to assess how consistently a testing process performs against defined quality requirements.

In simple terms:

Higher Sigma performance = fewer opportunities for errors = more consistent laboratory processes.

This makes Six Sigma an important tool for laboratory quality control, analytical performance and diagnostic test reliability.

What Did the Redcliffe Labs Study Evaluate?

Redcliffe Labs conducted a two-phase laboratory quality improvement project covering 25 routine, high-volume assay parameters.

The parameters included:

20 clinical chemistry methods
5 immunoassay methods

The initial assessment identified parameters with comparatively lower Sigma performance. The laboratory team then implemented targeted quality improvement measures over a six-month period.

A second assessment was conducted after these interventions to measure the change in laboratory analytical performance. The analysis was performed using Alinity ci series equipment from Abbott.

What Did the Study Find?

The study found a substantial improvement in overall Sigma performance.

Average Sigma Performance Increased From 6.4σ to 9.2σ

Across the 25 parameters assessed, the average Sigma metric increased from 6.4σ before the quality improvement measures to 9.2σ after implementation.

17 out of 25 parameters improved by more than 1.0 Sigma.

This demonstrated that targeted quality improvement measures could significantly strengthen the analytical performance of high-volume laboratory testing processes.

Glucose Testing Showed a Major Improvement

Glucose was one of the most notable improvements in the study.

The Sigma metric for glucose increased from:

3.9σ → 26.3σ

The corresponding estimated defect rate decreased from approximately:

9,224 DPMO → less than 1 DPMO

DPMO stands for Defects Per Million Opportunities. It is a way of measuring how frequently errors can occur within a process.

In practical terms, the improvement represented a substantial reduction in the estimated opportunity for analytical errors in glucose testing.

What Does 6 Sigma Mean for Laboratory Quality?

A Six Sigma level is widely used as a benchmark for very high process performance.

At a Six Sigma level, a process is associated with approximately 3.4 defects per million opportunities, or about 99.99966% defect-free performance under the conventional Six Sigma framework.

For diagnostic laboratories, the underlying principle is important: reducing process variation and errors can help improve the consistency and reliability of laboratory testing.

Why Is Laboratory Quality Control Important?

Every diagnostic report depends on multiple stages of laboratory testing working correctly.

Quality control helps laboratories:

Detect potential errors
Reduce variation in testing processes
Improve analytical performance
Reduce the need for repeat testing
Support consistent reporting
Strengthen confidence in laboratory results

For high-volume diagnostic laboratories, even small improvements in process quality can have a significant impact when applied across a large number of tests.

How Does Six Sigma Improve Laboratory Testing?

Six Sigma metrics provide laboratories with a measurable way to identify areas where analytical performance can be improved.

The approach used in the Redcliffe Labs study involved:

Measure → Identify gaps → Improve processes → Reassess performance

The laboratory first evaluated Sigma performance across the selected parameters. Parameters with lower performance were identified, targeted improvements were implemented, and the testing processes were assessed again after six months.

This allowed the team to measure whether the quality interventions had resulted in meaningful improvement.

What Is DPMO in Laboratory Testing?

DPMO means Defects Per Million Opportunities.

It is a quality metric used to estimate how many defects could occur for every one million opportunities within a process.

A lower DPMO indicates fewer estimated defects.

In the Redcliffe Labs study, the estimated DPMO for glucose testing decreased from 9,224 to less than 1, alongside a substantial improvement in its Sigma metric.

Why Does Analytical Accuracy Matter in Diagnostics?

Laboratory test results are an important part of clinical decision-making.

Doctors may use diagnostic results alongside a patient's symptoms, medical history and other investigations to determine the next steps in care.

This makes laboratory accuracy, consistency and quality control essential components of diagnostic services.

Strengthening laboratory processes can help reduce analytical variation and support the generation of reliable test results.

Key Findings at a Glance

Quality Metric	Study Finding
Parameters evaluated	25 routine high-volume parameters
Clinical chemistry	20 methods
Immunoassay	5 methods
Study design	Two-phase quality improvement project
Quality improvement period	6 months
Average Sigma performance	6.4σ → 9.2σ
Parameters improving by >1 Sigma	17 of 25
Glucose Sigma performance	3.9σ → 26.3σ
Glucose estimated DPMO	9,224 → <1
Analytical platform	Alinity ci series

What Does This Study Mean for Diagnostic Quality?

The findings demonstrate how data-driven laboratory quality improvement can be used to identify performance gaps and strengthen analytical processes.

Rather than treating laboratory quality as a one-time assessment, Sigma metrics provide a framework for continuously measuring laboratory performance and identifying opportunities for improvement.

For a high-volume diagnostic laboratory, this approach can contribute to more consistent processes, fewer errors and greater reliability in testing.

The Takeaway

Laboratory quality is built into the process, not added at the end.

The Redcliffe Labs study showed that applying Six Sigma metrics and targeted quality improvement measures could substantially improve analytical performance across routine, high-volume laboratory testing.

The improvement from 6.4σ to 9.2σ, along with the marked improvement in glucose testing, demonstrates the potential of structured quality management to strengthen laboratory accuracy, process consistency and diagnostic reliability.

Research Publication

The quality improvement work was also published as “Sigma metrics as quality indicators in guiding and tracking laboratory process improvement” in the International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences. The publication describes the use of Sigma metrics to assess and optimise statistical quality control in a high-volume clinical laboratory.

Research Keywords